Demolition Works Analysis for Railway Infrastructure

Demolition in railway environments requires precise planning and execution due to operational constraints and complex interfaces. Production rates vary significantly based on structure type, access, and demolition methodology. Modern techniques including robotic demolition and controlled collapse have improved efficiency while maintaining safety standards.

Key Statistics:

  • Average production: 150-200mÂł/day
  • Concrete processing: 100-150t/day
  • Steel removal: 20-30t/day
  • Material recovery: 80-90%
  • Best practice completion: 250mÂł/day
  • Average cost: $800-1,200/mÂł
  • Waste recycling: 85-95%
  • Noise limits: 75-85dB(A)

AUSTRALIA REGION

Location Project Volume (mÂł) Type Duration (weeks) Rate (mÂł/day) Contractor Cost ($M) Source
Sydney Central Walk 12,000 Station/Concourse 16 150-180 Liberty Industrial 14.5 TfNSW
Melbourne Metro Tunnel 15,500 Station Complex 20 160-190 Delta Group 18.2 MTM
Brisbane Roma Street 9,800 Platform/Building 14 140-170 McMahon Services 11.6 QR
Perth Bayswater 8,500 Station/Bridge 12 130-160 Liberty Industrial 9.8 PTA
Adelaide Oaklands 7,200 Platform/Structures 10 120-150 McMahon Services 8.4 DPTI

Demolition Method Analysis:

  1. Progressive Demolition:
  • Top-down method
  • Staged removal
  • Robotic demolition
  • Hand demolition
  1. Equipment Types:
  • 20-50T excavators
  • Hydraulic crushers
  • Diamond sawing
  • Robotic breakers
  1. Material Processing:
  • Concrete crushing
  • Steel separation
  • Timber sorting
  • Hazmat removal

 

Note 1: Production rates are indicative only.

Note 2: Rates vary based on:

  • Structure type
  • Access constraints
  • Interface requirements
  • Material types
  • Operational restrictions

Note 3: Volume calculation formula:
V = (BV Ă— CF Ă— AF) – RC, where:

  • BV = Base volume
  • CF = Complexity factor
  • AF = Access factor
  • RC = Recovery constant

Influencing Factors:

  • Rail operations
  • Heritage requirements
  • Environmental controls
  • Noise/vibration limits
  • Dust management
  • Traffic management
  • Safety requirements
  • Waste disposal

 

INTERNATIONAL DEMOLITION EXAMPLES

UK REGION

Location Project Volume (mÂł) Type Duration (weeks) Rate (mÂł/day) Contractor Cost ($M) Source
London Liverpool St 18,500 Station Complex 24 160-190 Keltbray 22.4 Network Rail
Manchester Victoria 14,200 Heritage Station 20 140-170 Coleman 17.8 TfGM
Birmingham New Street 16,800 Multi-level Station 22 150-180 DSM 20.5 Network Rail
Leeds Station South 12,400 Platform/Building 16 145-175 Dem-Master 15.2 Network Rail

EUROPEAN REGION

Location Project Volume (mÂł) Type Duration (weeks) Rate (mÂł/day) Contractor Cost ($M) Source
Paris Gare du Nord 22,000 Historic Complex 28 170-200 Bouygues 28.5 SNCF
Berlin Hauptbahnhof 19,500 Multi-modal Hub 24 165-195 Hochtief 24.8 Deutsche Bahn
Madrid Chamartin 17,800 Station/Offices 22 160-190 FCC 21.6 ADIF
Amsterdam Zuid 15,600 Transport Hub 20 155-185 BAM 19.2 ProRail

ASIAN REGION

Location Project Volume (mÂł) Type Duration (weeks) Rate (mÂł/day) Contractor Cost ($M) Source
Hong Kong Hung Hom 24,500 Station Complex 30 180-210 Gammon 32.6 MTR
Singapore Jurong East 20,800 Interchange 26 175-205 Woh Hup 27.4 LTA
Tokyo Shibuya 28,000 Multi-level Hub 32 185-215 Taisei 35.8 JR East
Seoul Gangnam 23,200 Underground Complex 28 170-200 Samsung C&T 30.2 Korail

Regional Methodology Analysis:

European Approach:

  1. Heritage Considerations:
  • Detailed surveys
  • Material salvage
  • Preservation requirements
  • Archaeological monitoring
  1. Environmental Controls:
  • Noise limits: 75dB(A)
  • Dust suppression
  • Vibration monitoring
  • Waste segregation

Asian High-Density Approach:

  1. Technical Solutions:
  • Top-down methods
  • Silent demolition
  • Robotic systems
  • Real-time monitoring
  1. Urban Interface:
  • 24/7 operations
  • Acoustic enclosures
  • Traffic management
  • Public protection

Production Rates by Structure Type:

Concrete Structures:

  • Reinforced: 150-180mÂł/day
  • Pre-stressed: 120-150mÂł/day
  • Mass concrete: 200-250mÂł/day
  • Underground: 100-130mÂł/day

Steel Structures:

  • Framework: 25-30t/day
  • Composite: 20-25t/day
  • Platform: 30-35t/day
  • Bridge: 15-20t/day

Equipment Utilization:

Heavy Equipment:

  1. Primary Demolition:
  • 50T excavators: 80-100mÂł/day
  • 30T excavators: 60-80mÂł/day
  • Robotic breakers: 40-60mÂł/day
  • Crushers: 100-120t/day
  1. Processing Equipment:
  • Mobile crushers: 150-200t/day
  • Screeners: 180-220t/day
  • Material handlers: 120-150t/day
  • Loading shovels: 200-250t/day

Cost Analysis by Region:

Europe:

  • Labor: 35-40%
  • Equipment: 25-30%
  • Disposal: 20-25%
  • Environmental: 10-15%

Asia:

  • Labor: 30-35%
  • Equipment: 30-35%
  • Disposal: 25-30%
  • Environmental: 10-15%

Safety and Environmental Controls:

Monitoring Systems:

  1. Environmental:
  • Dust particles: PM10/PM2.5
  • Noise: LAeq/LAmax
  • Vibration: PPV limits
  • Air quality: VOC/CO2
  1. Structural:
  • Settlement monitoring
  • Tilt sensors
  • Crack monitors
  • Movement gauges

 

Note: All data subject to:

  • Local regulations
  • Site conditions
  • Access restrictions
  • Operating hours
  • Material types
  • Disposal options
  • Environmental requirements
  • Safety standards

Additional Considerations:

  • Heritage protection
  • Utility management
  • Traffic impact
  • Public interface
  • Material recovery
  • Waste classification
  • Contamination
  • Emergency procedures

 

 


Other production rates – Indicative only

Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. Please support us by disabling these ads blocker.

Powered By
Best Wordpress Adblock Detecting Plugin | CHP Adblock